Legislation:SBR/P001-011/Original text
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Enactment clause, short and long titles
Be it enacted by the Grand Forum of All Citizens, as follows—
Proposition 001-011, Judiciary Act 2018
An Act to establish Justicial Councils inferior to the Senior Justicial Council and provide for their procedure.
Chapter I: General Provisions
Section A: Judges
- The Chief Justice may appoint and dismiss a judge by notice to the Rector and the Grand Forum.
- The Chief Justice is responsible for assigning a judge to an action.
Chapter II: On the Organisation of Councils
Section A: Council of First Instance
- There is hereby established a Council of First Instance.
- The Council of First Instance has original and exclusive jurisdiction over all actions in the first instance.
Section B: Council of Appeals
- There is hereby established a Council of Appeals.
- The Council of Appeals has original and exclusive jurisdiction over any appeal from a judgement of the Council of First Instance.
Chapter III: On the Procedure of Justicial Councils
Section A: Procedure rules
- The Chief Justice may from time to time enact rules regulating the conduct of proceedings in the Justicial Councils.
Section B: Advisory opinions
- The Senior Justicial Council may, on reference, give an advisory opinion as to any question of law.
- The Senior Justicial Council may dismiss a reference on the grounds that the reference—
- does not raise a question of law of general public importance;
- raises matters on which the law is already clear;
- is excessively vague.
- No court order may be made in an action proceeding on reference.
- A lower court may file a reference seeking an opinion on a question or proposition of law on which it seeks instruction for the proper decision of a case.
- An advisory opinion does not constitute binding judicial precedent, but a lower court must give respectful consideration to any advisory opinion of the Senior Justicial Council.
Section C: Judicial review
- The right of judicial review is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other rights that a party has to seek a review, whether by a Justicial Council or by another tribunal, authority or party, of that enactment, decision, conduct or failure.
- Where a person no longer holds or for whatever reason is not performing the duties of an office amenable to judicial review, a claim for judicial review may be made against—
- the person for the time being holding or performing the duties of that office or
- if there is no person for the time being performing the duties of that office or that office no longer exists, the Rector, or a personauthorised by them for such purpose.
Section D: Removal from court venues
- A Justicial Council may order that a person is removed from a venue of the Council if the person is continually disruptive to the proceedings of the court or disrespectful to the dignity of the court.
- A removal under this section may not be ordered for longer than is necessary.
Section E: Vexatious litigants
- The Chief Justice may designate an individual a vexatious litigant by notice to the Rector and the relevant individual if that individual has repeatedly attempted to initiate vexatious, frivolous or totally unmeritorious actions.
- An individual designated a vexatious litigant must not initiate any action without the permission of the court to which at which it is entered.
Chapter IV: On Offences Concerning the Judiciary
Section A: Offences under this Act
- A person who alleges publicly, to another person or to a public authority that another person is guilty of a criminal offence while knowing the allegation to be false commits an offence.
- A person who acts so as to obstruct the fair disposition of any court action is guilty of an offence.
- A person who wilfully asserts as to a matter of fact, opinion, belief or knowledge before a court, such assertion being known by the person to be false, and offered with the intent of misleading the court, commits an offence.
- A person who—
- violates a court order;
- breaches an undertaking to the court;
- publishes any statement that creates a real risk that the course of justice may be impaired;
- disrupts proceedings of the court;
- disrespects the dignity of the court;