Talk:Bradley's responce to Voice Responce
PrSR Response
Mr Bradley, you are one of the most controversial people in this community. I wonder if some people dislike you because you keep doing well in debates against them! We most surley agree that firing someone against the People's want is not to happen and a sign of not caring for the People's wishes, of which we hate. It might have been slightly (and we mean very little) rude in places but, then again, the person it is directed too hasn't been the nicest either. Hear, hear Bradley!
James Wilary of the People's reformed States Republic 22:59, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
Renasian Response
I must say, Mr Bradley, that your continued controversy has intrigued, and at times, amazed the Sectorate of Renasia. Still, we must submit to you, with sincerity, that your debating style leaves much to be desired. Your backing points are valid in some places, but you let show your weakness and diplomatic immaturity in allowing these points to be blackened by the tar of insults and hastiness. If you fail to take a form of high ground, you too will be crushed by the glacial flow of diplomatic debate.
Unfortunatly, your ad hominem attacks serve as a catalyst to spark more controversy, and while some may be impressed by riding the wake of this controversy, more will be silently hoping you fall and are swallowed up. We hope not to be inflammatory, merely to attempt to advise you.